- Tom Campbell’s story still doesn’t check out
- Bob Bennett Must Go
- Liberals Ask Mommy to Punish Yoo/Bybee
- Obama administration kills 23K space-related jobs in Florida.
- Senator Lamar Alexander 1, President Obama 0
- Obama Not That Concerned with Keeping the Arkansas Senate Seat
- Morning Briefing for February 23, 2010
- Russ Carnahan (D, MO-03) tries to pander to gun-friendly voters.
- Tommy Newberry on The War on Success
- Pitchforks, torches now acceptable for political demonstrations.
- Campbell Brown is Right and Hayworth is An Idiot if He Sticks to This
- The One Way Street
- Why We Should Rally Around Marlin Stutzman in Indiana
- Happy 201st Birthday Mr. President
- More Mail
- Our Deeds Live On The Longest
- PA-13: How scared are Dem incumbents?
- Passive Aggressive Behavior All Around Us
- The Rise of the Who Dat Nation
- Power And Control: They Aren’t Interchangeable
- Phishing for Carbon Credits
- Goring the Ox: Why John Oxendine Must Be Defeated
- DHS: Fossil Fuels and Climate Change are ‘National Threats’
- The NRSC wastes *no* time on properly greeting Giannoulias.
- 3.8 Trillion for What?
The Arsenal of Medicine
Saturday, November 21, 2009If you’re wondering where health care dollars go in this country, the invaluable Phil Klein reminds us:
Raymond Raad, a resident in psychiatry at New York Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center and co-author of a new Cato study, presented evidence showing that the United States leads the world in the development of drugs, medical devices, and other advanced treatments. For instance, between 1969 and 2008, 57 of the 97 Nobel Prizes in medicine and physiology — or nearly 60 percent — were awarded to people who did their research in the U.S., and nine of the top 10 medical innovations between 1975 and 2000 were developed here. But … once these products are developed in the U.S., they become widely available and improve health care outcomes around the world.
Read the whole thing, and remember: that’s the system the Democrats are trying to tear down and replace with one more like the European countries that depend almost as heavily on American medical and pharmaceutical innovations as they do on American military protection. In both cases, the arguments for the superiority of a European model that is unsustainable on its own depend on somebody else assuming the role of America. And nobody’s volunteering for the job.
...Original article from http://www.redstate.com/dan_mclaughlin/2009/11/20/the-arsenal-of-medicine/